SunnySurya
08-05 10:38 AM
I object to your insinuation and gross generalization.It is not your job to ask this question.It upto the law of the land to figure that out and root out dishonesty and deceit.
I don't know about rolling flood Just FYI I have an MBA from the US ( a top ) university and have been working with various fortune 100 companies.Currently on EAD.
I asked this before and asking again.How many of that EB2 got jobs with out faking their resumes and skill set.Atleast did you?
I don't know about rolling flood Just FYI I have an MBA from the US ( a top ) university and have been working with various fortune 100 companies.Currently on EAD.
I asked this before and asking again.How many of that EB2 got jobs with out faking their resumes and skill set.Atleast did you?
wallpaper New York City - Time Square
desi3933
07-11 10:33 AM
Hi UN,
First of all my sincere gratitude to you for your patience and the time you put in to give a detailed reply to all cases.
Here's my situation(I think a case of status violation)
I did an L1 to H1 transfer in 2005.My L1 was valid till APRIL 2006.So my intention was to work with L1 employer till April 2006 and then switch to H1 employer.
H1 employer also applied for a change of status, which I was not aware of that time.I asked the H1 company's lawyer whether I could continue with my L1 employer after getting the H1 and she said it's fine.
So I got the H1B approval in Oct 2005, but still continued with L1 employer till APRIL 2006, then switched to H1.
Your last action dictates the status you are in.As the last I-94 has H1 Status, you have 30 days to start working with new employer (or apply for CoS to stay on L1).It is usually a good idea to file H1 without Change of Status if you don't know the start date.In that case you have to re-enter US on that visa to get into that status.
Recently I came to know that this could be an issue.When I was filling the G-325A form, I wondered if I specify that I worked with the L1 employer till APRIL 2006, would they catch this??Even if they catch , how big an issue would this be??
If I put the dates to reflect the dates to show that I quit my L1 employer in Oct 2005 itself, would this be an issue??I guess in this case, if by any chance they ask for any further evidence like pay stubs or W2 in that period of time, I would be in trouble.
I would always suggest the real dates on any form.Section 245(k) covers out-of-status issues.Why lie and caught for fraud when we have protection under law.
If caught for fraud, it can cause some very serious issues.I-485 can be denied just on this basis.
[COLOR="Red"]
From what I have read from the forum, A lawful re-entry should clear the violation in my case right??I haven't filed the I-485 yet.My I-140 is pending.
Do they catch this during I-140 stage??
ALSO CAN THEY DENY H1B DUE TO PREVIOUS VIOLATION OF STATUS, WHILE I RE-ENTER??This is my biggest fear now!!!
Can I go to Canada/Mexico for stamping?where would I get an appointment at the earliest??
1.Re-entry erases out-of-status and puts one in valid status.As per section 245(k), one is required to be instatus (or out of status < 180 days) since last entry into US.
2.You were out-of-status, not unlawful presence (i.e.staying past due I-94 date).So visa can not denied on the basis of out-of-status.
3.Not sure about getting visa from Canada.Is it your first time for getting H1 visa stamp?
________________________
Not a legal advice.
First of all my sincere gratitude to you for your patience and the time you put in to give a detailed reply to all cases.
Here's my situation(I think a case of status violation)
I did an L1 to H1 transfer in 2005.My L1 was valid till APRIL 2006.So my intention was to work with L1 employer till April 2006 and then switch to H1 employer.
H1 employer also applied for a change of status, which I was not aware of that time.I asked the H1 company's lawyer whether I could continue with my L1 employer after getting the H1 and she said it's fine.
So I got the H1B approval in Oct 2005, but still continued with L1 employer till APRIL 2006, then switched to H1.
Your last action dictates the status you are in.As the last I-94 has H1 Status, you have 30 days to start working with new employer (or apply for CoS to stay on L1).It is usually a good idea to file H1 without Change of Status if you don't know the start date.In that case you have to re-enter US on that visa to get into that status.
Recently I came to know that this could be an issue.When I was filling the G-325A form, I wondered if I specify that I worked with the L1 employer till APRIL 2006, would they catch this??Even if they catch , how big an issue would this be??
If I put the dates to reflect the dates to show that I quit my L1 employer in Oct 2005 itself, would this be an issue??I guess in this case, if by any chance they ask for any further evidence like pay stubs or W2 in that period of time, I would be in trouble.
I would always suggest the real dates on any form.Section 245(k) covers out-of-status issues.Why lie and caught for fraud when we have protection under law.
If caught for fraud, it can cause some very serious issues.I-485 can be denied just on this basis.
[COLOR="Red"]
From what I have read from the forum, A lawful re-entry should clear the violation in my case right??I haven't filed the I-485 yet.My I-140 is pending.
Do they catch this during I-140 stage??
ALSO CAN THEY DENY H1B DUE TO PREVIOUS VIOLATION OF STATUS, WHILE I RE-ENTER??This is my biggest fear now!!!
Can I go to Canada/Mexico for stamping?where would I get an appointment at the earliest??
1.Re-entry erases out-of-status and puts one in valid status.As per section 245(k), one is required to be instatus (or out of status < 180 days) since last entry into US.
2.You were out-of-status, not unlawful presence (i.e.staying past due I-94 date).So visa can not denied on the basis of out-of-status.
3.Not sure about getting visa from Canada.Is it your first time for getting H1 visa stamp?
________________________
Not a legal advice.
ItIsNotFunny
01-08 11:47 AM
Rayyan,
You are a highly skilled person.Think objectively:
1.This thread is not immigration related.It is a non-immigration thread that admins allow just as a communication platform among people and has nothing to do with IV.
2.People can have their opinions.You really can't stop.It becomes objectionable when it is personal.Then, you report as Abusive link and moderators will take actions.I have reported couple of abusive language posts in past and action was taken in very short time.
3.Please don't mix issues.Your efforts for enlightening people about immigration issues are appreciated.You should not leave because couple of threads are running that you don't like.
My 2 cents to you, to bfadlia and everyone.
You are best example of hypocrites and double standard:cool:.You will be very successful in your life, take my words.....
I read your all post, the above post just makes me confused.How could you just bash one community , their beliefs ,make fun of their Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him and all the prophets ), his teaching , saying the that Mohamed has fooled his followers , let him , we want to be fools what can you do about it?and then later come up with such a statement.
If it makes you furious , so does it to us.
How do you justify your anger and hatred towards one community.
I used to be very involved in all the immigrationvoice.org matters.When I was in a small town in Florida( moved to another city), there were lot of Indians unaware of immigrationvoice.org and immigration issues.I did lot of efforts to educate them and made them aware of this site and its efforts.My wallet and heart was always open for immigrationvoice.org .But after Mumbai attacks and this link, I can see the hatred towards my community.
people have justified the killing of small kids saying that let them die today anyhow they are going to be terrorist in future.Pathetic, sad to hear this from so called highly educated people..
I am out of this discussion , out of immigarionvoice...
Peace Amen !!!!!
You are a highly skilled person.Think objectively:
1.This thread is not immigration related.It is a non-immigration thread that admins allow just as a communication platform among people and has nothing to do with IV.
2.People can have their opinions.You really can't stop.It becomes objectionable when it is personal.Then, you report as Abusive link and moderators will take actions.I have reported couple of abusive language posts in past and action was taken in very short time.
3.Please don't mix issues.Your efforts for enlightening people about immigration issues are appreciated.You should not leave because couple of threads are running that you don't like.
My 2 cents to you, to bfadlia and everyone.
You are best example of hypocrites and double standard:cool:.You will be very successful in your life, take my words.....
I read your all post, the above post just makes me confused.How could you just bash one community , their beliefs ,make fun of their Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him and all the prophets ), his teaching , saying the that Mohamed has fooled his followers , let him , we want to be fools what can you do about it?and then later come up with such a statement.
If it makes you furious , so does it to us.
How do you justify your anger and hatred towards one community.
I used to be very involved in all the immigrationvoice.org matters.When I was in a small town in Florida( moved to another city), there were lot of Indians unaware of immigrationvoice.org and immigration issues.I did lot of efforts to educate them and made them aware of this site and its efforts.My wallet and heart was always open for immigrationvoice.org .But after Mumbai attacks and this link, I can see the hatred towards my community.
people have justified the killing of small kids saying that let them die today anyhow they are going to be terrorist in future.Pathetic, sad to hear this from so called highly educated people..
I am out of this discussion , out of immigarionvoice...
Peace Amen !!!!!
2011 Times Square at Night,
years of age on early retirement.This scheme will be
known as RAPE (Retire Aged People Early).
Persons selected to be RAPED can apply to management
to be eligible for the SHAFT scheme (Special Help
After Forced Termination) .Persons who have been
RAPED and SHAFTED will be reviewed under the SCREW
scheme (Scheme Covering Retired Early Workers).
Person may be RAPED once, SHAFTED twice and SCREWED as
many times as Management deems appropriate.
Persons who have been RAPED can only get AIDS
(Additional Income for Dependants or Spouse) or HERPES
(Half Earnings for Retired Personnel Early
Severance).
Obviously persons who have AIDS or HERPES will not be
SHAFTED or SCREWED any further by management.Persons
staying on will receive as much SHIT (Special High
Intensity Training) as possible.Management has
always prided itself on the amount of SHIT it gives
employees.Should you feel that you do not receive
enough SHIT, please bring to the attention of your
Supervisor.They have been trained to give you all
the SHIT you can handle.
Sincerely,
The Management
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.